Preparation Pays Off - Big time
One of those days, when the disaster you didn’t want, barges through the door, but forward planning, preparations, testing gets you through the day. Also known as, we and our gweeky friends say “Ku-oool,” while the rest of the family say, “uhhh, ok, we’re happy for you.”
We could have had a major disaster (i.e. my day ruined, as opposed to things melting down) which were nicely averted because of (as said before.)
- forward planning
- tests to verify the preparation.
- activate on live system
- what have we learned
Our PRIMARY data link provider suddenly went off the air. More of our workers are at remote sites, than are at the central office (where I’m sitting.) The WAN going down means that a lot of people are not able to do their work (or are impaired from using IT services they are normally reliant on.)
The diagram indicates the level of dependence those satellite sites have on this primary data center. Site A has a completely independent data service, so loss of the link limits a few operational issues for IT, but no loss of service to the business.
Site’s B, and C, are independent for the majority of their business needs, but in the current situation are dependent on our Primary Data Center for shared services such as e-mail. Other than that, they can operate without the WAN link.
Sites D, E, and F can’t work while the Primary Data Center is OFFLINE.
We couldn’t connect to the provider’s next hop link, and we definitely couldn’t get any traffic, let alone BGP routing information.
All those nice tricks for verifying that your BGPD server is up and running are nice, but they don’t do you any good when your 5 other sites confirm that the primary vendor’s BGP Server is definitely not online
Forward Planning ?
After years of cajouling, the powers above folded and added a SECONDARY WAN service instead of the previous dependence we had of tunneling VPN through an Internet ISP connection.
Unfortunately, since there were budget constraints and the original WAN Data Link service was commissioned without regard for a secondary, we had to come up with some mechanisms for getting the SECONDARY connected.
After balancing different options with what the business operations required and our limited resources, we decided to configure the two systems as ACTIVE-STANDBY. One Link was ACTIVE (the Primary link) and the other configured as a STANDBY service. We could automate the switch, but given the reality of the infrastructure, we would meet a requirement of X hours to switch the data between the services(i.e. go from ACTIVE-STANDBY to OFF-ACTIVE)
We gradually rolled out the secondary, backup, data link using off-the-shelf desktops as the routing/gateways. The routing, access policies were updated to include the potential for routing through the secondary link.
For some sites, and services, we load balanced traffic along both data links.
All the preparations were nice and dandy, but what would we actually have to do to make sure things were flipped from one service to the other? We needed to do a partial test on the actual network instead of our test network.
After some time, we just pushed through that downtime was required and a full service test is required taking all OFFLINE while we routing changes, tests (of course we had to do it during organisation down-time, which inevitably means that IT are up at odd hours or working during everyone else’s downtime/bedtime)
Going through the preparations and controlled tests forced us to look at ways to minimise operator error during the process (controlled automation in as many bits of the process as possible.)
We successfully completed the tests on a subset of the full WAN network (site B, and D with the Primary Data Center,) found some further points in the operation that we wanted to improve and went through evolving those bits of the operation.
Suffice it to say, after that test, we were confident that we could switch over from FAILED-STANDBY to FAILED-ACTIVE well within the 2 ~ 4 hour window that was part of our agreement with business.
Activating on LIVE System
Doing my bit sleeping during one of those interminable meetings where you watch paint drying on the wall, or the back of your eye-lids (depending on how lucky you are.) One of the IT team woke me up, seriously disturbing the meeting, to say that all hell has broken loose. All sites were down, the WAN Link has disappeared. People were running trying to figure what to do next.
What do I tell XYZ at Site-A?
What do I tell everyone here at main office ?
What, when, where, who ?
I walk calmly to my desk, to find that my offsider (partner in these things) wasn’t at his desk.
That’s odd ?
Sit myself down at the desk. OK, look at through some of the charts generated by Smokeping, yup the primary link looks like it disappears about *here (pointing at the screen.) The charts also show that the secondary link is humming along just fine, although latency to Site B is off the charts (200 ms, is that even possible?)
My boss sees me working and goes to get a cup of coffee.
Log onto our WAN Gateway box, and yup our BGP Server is humming along just fine, we’re advertising our LAN routes through BGP but that’s all I can see (as mentioned earlier, the Primary linkn next hop is not responding to pings so we can’t get to it and there’s no hope of trying to get BGP traffic from/through there.)
Switching from the Primary Link to the Backup Link
ACTIVE-STANDBY to FAILED-ACTIVE
Using the shortcuts I’ve got, log onto 3 of the 6 remote sites through the secondary data link. Site D, E, and F. Site B is not connecting on either of its redundant active-passive gateways. Yep, BGPD is running fine on those sites, and showing advertising but no other routing information on those servers.
Run a script on each active gateway and we are now flipped over to the secondary link.
Total time to flip the link between 4 sites ? About 3 ~ 4 minutes after sitting down at the desk.
What happened to the other 3 sites?
Site A, and C we haven’t rolled out the secondary links (Site A is wired but we haven’t had anyone available to go down and plug things in. It’s also a low prioarity. Site C is only a month old and just hasn’t had reason for the secondary link, if the link failure is prolonged then users can work through the User VPN or we can set up a slow tunnel through the Internet.
Site B had the 200ms latency problem. My admin-buddy had to walk across to that office.
Testing the Service
Spent another 30~40 minutes going through the routing validation process, and refining the routing et. al. (yeah, you’ve really got to get a document together of these things, largely so you’ve actually gone through the exercise and have a clearer experience with what needs to be done.)
Fortunately, because we have QOS Queues on our gateways, specific for each Data Link Service, it is easy to confirm whether data is still routed through the Failed Primary Service, or if they are all going through the Active Secondary/Backup Service.
We make some corrections in our queueing that were showing some traffic still showing up on the FAILED link. Adjusted a few things here and there that would simplify the whole process in the future.
Switch from STANDBY-ACTIVE to ACTIVE-STANDBY
Another 30 minutes passes, and the Primary Service comes back online. Since the Primary Service provides a much much bigger Data Link than our Secondary link, we are definitely very keen to put everything back onto it.
In two minutes, we were able to re-route all remote WAN sites to talk to each other through the Primary Link (to ease some of the traffic from the Secondary link) especially since this is a very minimal part of the traffic, but let’s us look at the routing issue as well as whether the service can at least stay up for more than a few seconds.
After another while, we re-route all traffic back to the Primary link. That took another two minutes (at most.)
The last switch, no-one knew about.
What have we learned
Even with the knowledge we gained from the controlled TEST, we gained a whole lot more knowledge when having to perform the same process on the WHOLE network.
We’ve identified a few more areas that we can better administer, automate, and are in the process of updating those.
Putting the effort down up front sure saved my bacon, more important for the business, it meant that after jumping up and down that their network connection was down, the users could sit down and get on with work (making money for the company, serving customers et. al.)
Active - Active ?
Why aren’t the Data Link’s on Active-Active ?
Not really worth the effort at this point (not our call)
- The Data Links are not equivalent, they have their different benefits but are not equal to make it an easy load balancing equation
- Doable, but with a lot of ‘moving parts’ that will be difficult
to maintain within our current resource constraints.
- Remember that whatever knobs are tuned to get ACTIVE-ACTIVE
has to be easy and quick to switch back when one of the
services fail and we have ACTIVE-FAIL or FAIL-ACTIVE.
- Remember that whatever knobs are tuned to get ACTIVE-ACTIVE has to be easy and quick to switch back when one of the services fail and we have ACTIVE-FAIL or FAIL-ACTIVE.
Where was my admin-buddy ?
Sometimes the call of nature is of even higher priority than your IT needs.
Smiling on the train home, ‘cause I’m not working overtime tonight (you do get overtime don’t you ? (smiling because we know we don’t.))
Oh yeah, those six sites? They’re connected using OpenBSD 4.8 redundant ACTIVE-PASSIVE gateways. Connecting to them, monitoring, managing during uptime and downtime are just a blast!!